Cases 1 - 10 of 53
HANAFI v. UETSA TSAKITS, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01765
Plaintiff:
Mary Hanafi
Defendant:
Uetsa Tsakits, Inc. doing business as MaxLend, David Johnson, Kirk Michael Chewning and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CLARK v. WATSON TIRE AND AUTO SERVICE, INC.
as 1:2023cv01213
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CLARK
Defendant:
WATSON TIRE AND AUTO SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
LEMMONS v. MAKES CENTS, INC. d/b/a MAXLEND et al
as 1:2022cv01455
Plaintiff:
Lindzy Lemmons
Defendant:
Makes Cents, Inc., dba MaxLend, Uetsa Tsakits, Inc., David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PARKER v. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. PARKER
Defendant:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, CITY OF RICHMOND, INDIANA, CLARK DIETZ, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
STATE OF INDIANA EX. REL HILL v. NORTH CLARK MEDICAL GROUP, LLC
as 4:2020cv00195
Defendant:
NORTH CLARK MEDICAL GROUP, LLC
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA, EX. REL HILL and STATE OF INDIANA EX REL. HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IMO 2020 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 3:2020mc00017
In Re:
Mark Arnold Werling, John Christopher Havill, Steven Stoy Crone and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
