Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mark Smith, et al v. MetroGroup Development II LLC, et al
as 17-15356
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK SMITH, LEE COLEMAN, ERIC WHEELER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
METROGROUP DEVELOPMENT II LLC and MGFD YORK, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
YOUNG CONTRACTING/ SE, INC.
:
SERVICE
Dees et al v. Coleman American Moving Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00292
Defendant:
Coleman American Moving Services, Inc. and Allied Van Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Dees and Janie Dees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gullett-El v. Watson et al
as 3:2017cv00472
Petitioner:
Taquan Rahshe Gullett-El
Respondent:
Kim Lee Watson, Jim Haskett, Patrick Sheridan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Curtis v. Allied Van Lines Inc et al
as 2:2015cv02344
Plaintiff:
John Curtis
Defendant:
Allied Van Lines Inc and Coleman American Moving Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford Connecticut v. Coleman et al
as 1:2014cv02874
Plaintiff:
The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford Connecticut
Defendant:
Latonia Coleman and India Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simons et al v. Coleman American Moving Services Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01290
Plaintiff:
Cindy Simons and Lynn Simons
Defendant:
Coleman American Moving Services Inc and Allied Van Lines Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Family Dollar Stores Inc et al
as 7:2014cv00161
Plaintiff:
Mark Smith , Lee Coleman , Eric Wheeler and others
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores Inc , Metrogroup Development and Foresite Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coleman v. Aqua Toy Store, Inc.
as 0:2013cv60166
Plaintiff:
Donald Coleman
Defendant:
Aqua Toy Store, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Coleman v. Aqua Toy Store, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Donald Coleman
Defendant:
Aqua Toy Store, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
