Cases 1 - 10 of 46
ABDUL v. CONNER
as 1:2024cv21068
Plaintiff:
JABBAAR MUHAAHID ABDUL
Defendant:
Robert Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRITTEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
CORDERRO R BRITTEN
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, CONNER and SPREAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABDUL v. CONNER
as 4:2024cv00082
Petitioner:
JABBAAR MUHAAHID ABDUL and JABBAAR MUJAAHID ABDUL
Respondent:
ROBERT CONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cenecharl v. Dixon et al
as 2:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Jean Cenecharl
Defendant:
Mr. Dixon, Mark Jones, Captain Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cenecharl v. Dixon et al
as 2:2023cv00351
Plaintiff:
Jean Cenecharl
Defendant:
Mr. Dixon, Mark Jones, Captain Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graves v. Boree et al
as 3:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Anthony Graves
Defendant:
M.A. Boree, R.B. Cole, C.E. Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PITTMAN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00451
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FENNELL PITTMAN
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, LISA D MESSER, ROBERT CONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS MARSHALL JACKSON
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, JOHNNY FRAMBO, ROBERT CONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AITKEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MICHAEL AITKEN
Defendant:
MR R DIXON, MR CONNER, R DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holley v. Conner et al
as 9:2022cv80416
Plaintiff:
Anthony Holley
Defendant:
Burton Conner, Melanie May, Martha Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
