Cases 21 - 30 of 702
Kabroo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv50372
Plaintiff:
Jamal E. Kabroo
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Augustine v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv14362
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Augustine
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Grieco v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv13937
Plaintiff:
Anthony E Grieco
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BOGEMANN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01625
Plaintiff:
KRISTOPHER E BOGEMANN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JENNINGS v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
LANA E. JENNINGS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Huntington v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv50306
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Huntington
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rogers v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Rogers
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SULLIVAN v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
MARK E. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
VAUGHN v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
DEBRA E. VAUGHN
Defendant:
KIJAKAZI and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ebel v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Charlene E. Ebel
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
