Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Glasgow v. Smith
as 3:2012cv00081
Plaintiff:
Michael Henri; Glasgow
Defendant:
Stephen E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Olson et al v. O'Brien et al
as 3:2011cv00245
Plaintiff:
David E. Olson and Absolute Environmental Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark O'Brien , James Cantor and Richard Welsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ballot v. Erlich et al
as 3:2011cv00154
Plaintiff:
Peter E. Ballot
Defendant:
Richard Erlich, Alaska State Trooper and Village Police Safety Officer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Khan v. DOC Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00028
Plaintiff:
Izaz E Khan
Defendant:
DOC Department of Corrections, Miller, Correctional Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. APD Anchorage Police Department Officer et al
as 3:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Izaz E Khan
Defendant:
APD Anchorage Police Department Officer and C. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nuglene et al v. State of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services et al
as 3:2011cv00021
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Nuglene
Defendant:
State of Alaska Department of Health and Social Services and Alaska Court System
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901
Simmons v. Wallace et al
as 3:2010cv00280
Plaintiff:
David Simmons
Defendant:
Stephen B. Wallace, Mark I. Wood, Joseph E. Wrona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Champion v. Potter et al
as 3:2010cv00275
Plaintiff:
David Champion
Defendant:
John E. Potter, Dianne Horbochuk, Ron Habberman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
E. et al v. Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District et al
as 3:2009cv00197
Plaintiff:
R. E., S. E. and M. S.
Defendant:
Matanuska-Susitna Borough School District and George Troxel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Khan v. DOC Department of Correction Anchorage Jail East Bldg
as 3:2009cv00151
Plaintiff:
Izaz E Khan
Defendant:
DOC Department of Correction Anchorage Jail East Bldg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
