Cases 21 - 30 of 345
Sisk v. Grayson County Dentention Center et al
as 4:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
George E. Sisk
Defendant:
Grayson County Dentention Center and Jason Woosley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Quality Corrections Healthcare et al
as 2:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dave Burke
Defendant:
Quality Corrections Healthcare, C.E.O. Johnny E. Bates, Doctor Kern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Sumner et al
as 6:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Smith
Defendant:
Stephanie Sumner, Ms. Lawson and Carrie Cunnagin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. USA
as 0:2022cv00083
Petitioner:
Paul E. Hart
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bell v. Joyner et al
as 7:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Marti E. Bell
Defendant:
H. Joyner, Melvin, Herley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2022cv00165
Plaintiff:
Daniel H. Jones
Defendant:
Kent Hendrickson, Glenn E. Acree, Christopher Nickell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Smith
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Avren Scott
Defendant:
E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Binyah v. Wallace et al
as 3:2022cv00376
Plaintiff:
Yadi'el Amrum Binyah and Eugene E. Wade, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Helen Wallace and Magistrate Paula Durden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilburn v. Worthington et al
as 0:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Kilburn
Defendant:
Mike Worthington, Amanda Clark, Charles Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Woosley v. USA
as 5:2022cv00126
Petitioner:
James E. Woosley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
