Cases 21 - 30 of 583
Dillon v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
Curtis E. Dillon
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Bickham
as 5:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Berry v. Hilburn et al
as 3:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
Willie E. Berry, Jr.
Defendant:
Cecil Hilburn, Keenen Letcher, Liondell Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Caddo Correctional Center
as 5:2023cv00611
Plaintiff:
Grandville Dewayne Williams
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center, Mgr Fredieu, Steve Prator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackburn v. LeBlanc
as 3:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Leonard E. Blackburn
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampley v. Bickham et al
as 3:2023cv00328
Petitioner:
Carlos Lampley
Respondent:
E. Dustin Bickham and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Parker v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
Marlowe E Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Louisiana State, Randy Smith and St. Tammany Parish Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Bickham et al
as 3:2023cv00480
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ricardo Johnson
Defendant:
E Dustin Bickham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manigo v. Prator et al
as 5:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Manigo
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Caddo Correctional Medical Center, Deputy Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manigo v. Hall et al
as 5:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Manigo
Defendant:
Senae D Hall, Logan McDonald and James E Stewart, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
