Cases 1 - 10 of 531
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Whitten v. The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
as 2:2024cv00276
Petitioner:
Landon Whitten
Defendant:
The 71st District Harrison County Court, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00992
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01423
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 9:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wendell Harrison
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Property Officer Garret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Harrison et al
as 7:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Chance L. Harrison, Robert C. Lyon, Young Central Appraisal District and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Harrison v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 4:2024cv01130
Plaintiff:
Crystal Harrison
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramey, et al. v. medQ, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Cheri Ramey and Jana Harrison
Defendant:
medQ, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
