Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Hickman v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65596
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Hickman
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hickman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02428
Plaintiff:
Doris Hickman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hickman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01299
Plaintiff:
Stephen Hickman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hickman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
Wesley Robert Hickman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hickman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00817
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Tonya Hickman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Hope v. Berg et al
as 5:2021cv01308
Plaintiff:
Valerie Hope
Defendant:
Angela Berg, Stephanie Bowens, Rebecca McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickman v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01679
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kit Hickman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hickman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv06030
Plaintiff:
Darla J. Hickman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Fiscal Court of Hickman County Kentucky v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2020op45254
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
The Fiscal Court of Hickman County Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
