Cases 1 - 10 of 142
GLBT Youth in Iowa Schools Task Force et al v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
GLBT Youth in Iowa Schools Task Force doing business as Iowa Safe Schools, Belinda Scarrott, Richard Carlson and others
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, McKenzie Snow, Iowa Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Engel v. Hutchinson
as 6:2017cv03287
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Kevin Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Engel v. Kielman et al
as 6:2017cv03289
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Jennifer Kielman, Dan Lucy, Megan Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Engel v KY3 et al.
as 3:2017cv05239
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
KY3 News, KSPR News and KOLR News
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Engel v. Federal Communication Commission
as 3:2017cv05235
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Federal Communication Commission
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Engel v. Hutchinson et al
as 6:2017cv03288
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Kevin Hutchinson, Elizabeth Gathright and Lacey Jasper
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Engel v. Forhetz et al
as 6:2017cv03286
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Ethan Forhetz, Sarah Forhetz, Emily Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Engel v. Gray Television & Subsidiaries KY3 KSPR et al
as 3:2017cv05237
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Gray Television & Subsidiaries KY3 KSPR, Hilton Howell, Jr., Jason Effinger and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Engel v. KY3 News et al
as 3:2017cv05232
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
KY3 News, KSPR News and KOLR News
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Engel v. Stone County Missouri Judge Alan Blankenship
as 3:2017cv05228
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Stone County Missouri Judge Alan Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
