Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Camacho v. CNMI Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Babauta Camacho
Defendant:
CNMI Department of Corrections, LT. Benjamin Lizama and COIII Lianna Quitugua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Brimmer et al
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Wislene Casy and others
Defendant:
Philip A. Brimmer, David DLG Atalig, Tom Kucharski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Whang v. Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLC
as 1:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
James Whang doing business as South Pacific Lumber Company
Defendant:
Imperial Pacific International (CNMI), LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Camacho v. Yaroitemal et al
as 1:2018cv00021
Defendant:
Captain Pius Yaroitemal, Manuela Deleon Guerrero, Jose K. Pangelinan and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Babauta Camacho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho et al
as 1:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Babauta Camacho, Jose Santos and Xu Guang Li
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Vincent S. Attao, Georgia M. Cabrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camacho v. CNMI Department of Corrections
as 1:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Babauta Camacho
Defendant:
CNMI Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Reedom v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Reedom
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security et al
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
