Cases 31 - 40 of 152
HALLER v. USMAN et al
as 2:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY HALLER
Defendant:
SULMAN USMAN, JAMISON HINDER and ADAPTIVE GREEN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holness v. Jamison
as 4:2022cv00128
Petitioner:
Ryan Holness
Respondent:
Warden J.L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rivera v. Jamison
as 1:2022cv00120
Petitioner:
Efrain Troche Rivera
Respondent:
Warden Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ahmed et al v. Jamison
as 1:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Shahzad Ahmed, Joseph Cromp, Sr., Marion Tingman and others
Respondent:
J.L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barnes v. Jamison
as 1:2022cv00049
Petitioner:
Talmadge Derrell Barnes
Respondent:
J.L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moulton, Jr. v. Jamison
as 3:2021cv02082
Petitioner:
Richard M. Moulton, Jr.
Respondent:
J.L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rivers v. Jamison
as 1:2021cv01409
Petitioner:
Virgil Rivers
Respondent:
J.L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JAMISON v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20027
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA JAMISON
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MCKESSON CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Almashwali v. Jamison
as 3:2021cv01195
Petitioner:
Abdullah Almashwali
Respondent:
J.L. Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bennett et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv13454
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Christina Bennett, Mamie Hall-Nash, Shirley Hall-Ramsey and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
