Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jenkins v. The United States of America Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:18-cr-00300-1.
as 4:2022cv03985
Petitioner:
Kevin Joshua Jenkins
Respondent:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jenkins, Jr. v. USA Do not docket in this case. File only in 2:19-CR-85-00002.
as 2:2022cv00245
Petitioner:
Roger Jenkins, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jenkins v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lamar Jenkins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jenkins v. United States Of America
as 6:2019cv00071
Petitioner:
Anitra Deshea Jenkins
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jenkins v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00780
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Bentley M Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jenkins v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv00928
Petitioner:
Bentley Mark Jenkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jenkins v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00987
Petitioner:
Joshua Jenkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jenkins v. USA
as 4:2017cv00184
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lawrence Jenkins, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jenkins v. USA
as 4:2016cv00448
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Bentley Mark Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jenkins v. United States Of America Do not docket in this case. Docket entries should be made in 6:03-cr-75. Case transferred to 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.
as 6:2016cv00033
Petitioner:
Anitra Deshea Jenkins
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
