Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Jenkins v. City of Burlington, Kentucky et al
as 2:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Burlington, Kentucky, Brian Newman, Edward Prindle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago v. Doom et al
as 3:2010cv00039
Plaintiff:
Alberto J. Santiago, Sr.
Defendant:
Nancy Doom, LaDonna Thompson, Jenetta Fulkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Cushwa et al
as 6:2009cv00264
Petitioner:
Darrell J. Parks
Respondent:
Patricia K. Cushwa, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Cranston J. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jenkins v. Eneje et al
as 0:2009cv00059
Petitioner:
Esau Jenkins
Respondent:
Eneje, Decker and M. L. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jenkins v. Simpson
as 5:2009cv00132
Petitioner:
Mark Jenkins
Respondent:
Thomas Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gross v. Unknown Director of the Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Gross, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Director of the Bureau of Prisons, Louis Milusmic, Unknown Designating Team and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jenkins v. Dailey
as 3:2008cv00196
Petitioner:
Ervin T. Jenkins
Respondent:
Tom Dailey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jenkins v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2008cv00079
Plaintiff:
Terry Jenkins
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Fred Cowan, Daniel Goyette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00688
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jenkins v. Leavell et al
as 5:2007cv00002
Plaintiff:
Kelly T. Jenkins, Kelly T. Jenkins and Kelly T. Jenkins
Defendant:
Livy Leavell, Jr., Livy Leavell, Jr., Steve Tribble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
