Cases 41 - 50 of 2,303
Erwine v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Michael Erwine
Defendant:
United States of America, Churchill County, Benjamin Trotter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
v. Erwine et al
as 3:2024cv00044
Defendant:
Michael Erwine, United States of America, Churchill County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Wallace v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
John William Wallace
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Demos Jr. v. USA et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos Jr.
Respondent:
USA and Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Kirby v. Brietenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
John Edward Kirby
Respondent:
Warden Brietenbach and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Love et al v. Pond et al
as 2:2023cv02149
Plaintiff:
Teresa Love and Vietta Hankins
Defendant:
Rachel Pond, John Vance, Sheldon G. Turley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RB Venture Partners LLC et al v. Montrose Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02150
Plaintiff:
RB Venture Partners LLC and 19 Enterprises LLC
Defendant:
Montrose Holdings, LLC, John Cota Small, John C. Small and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jones v. Morgan et al
as 2:2023cv02100
Plaintiff:
Edward Jones
Defendant:
Daryl Morgan, John Hoffman and Matthew Gillis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
