Cases 1 - 10 of 148
JOHNSON v. DC ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
KEITH DIMITRI JOHNSON
Defendant:
DC ATTORNEY GENERAL and DC MAYOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
as 1:2023cv00347
Petitioner:
CHARLES M. JOHNSON
Respondent:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 1:2022cv03395
Plaintiff:
JARREL JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BRAGG
as 1:2022cv03394
Petitioner:
JARREL JOHNSON
Respondent:
TRAVIS BRAGG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
EL-MEZAIN v. MAYORKAS
as 1:2022cv01501
Petitioner:
Mohammed EL-MEZAIN
Not Classified By Court:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK GARLAND, TAE JOHNSON and others
Respondent:
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, MERRICK B. GARLAND and DIANNE WHITE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2022cv00826
Petitioner:
CHARESE JOHNSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
STEWART-BEY v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 1:2021cv02981
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B. STEWART-BEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, QUINCY L. BOOTH and LENNARD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv01984
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG
Defendant:
DAN JOHNSON and DAVID W FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv01986
Petitioner:
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG
Respondent:
DAN JOHNSON and DAVID FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2021cv01985
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KENNETH YOUNG
Defendant:
DAN JOHNSON and DAVID FARRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
