Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pena-Venegas et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv01847
Plaintiff:
Izabel Pena-Venegas and Beverly Ward
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., RB Health (US) LLC, The Procter & Gamble Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Thorns et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2023cv01355
Plaintiff:
Amanda Thorns and Scott Collier
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Procter & Gamble Company, Walgreen Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Condon-Johnson & Associates, Inc. v. Apple Truck Logistics
as 1:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Condon-Johnson & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple Truck Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Johnson et al v. Marriott International, Inc.
as 3:2018cv02119
Plaintiff:
Chris Harris and David Johnson
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of Castaneda v. Conway et al
as 3:2017cv01075
Plaintiff:
Estate of Castaneda and James Blume
Defendant:
Jack K. Conway, Chase Bank, Lisa Marie MacCarley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fifield et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03071
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans/B of A, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Nick Johnson
Plaintiff:
Curtis A. Fifield and Debbie A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Fifield et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03070
Plaintiff:
Curtis A. Fifield and Deborah A. Hill
Defendant:
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and Nick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Arunga et al v. American Civil Liberties Union Foundation et al
as 6:2009cv06175
Plaintiff:
James Aggrey-Kweggyir Arunga and Doreen H. Lee
Defendant:
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California, Nicole Ozer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
