Cases 11 - 20 of 163
Siggers v. Hamp et al
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Reno Fenelli Siggers
Defendant:
K.C. Hamp, Sr., Jammie Lewis, Ms. Persundra Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Loden
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Russell K. Hill
Defendant:
Warden C. Loden
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Loden
as 4:2022cv00159
Petitioner:
Russell K. Hill
Respondent:
Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Keyhe
as 3:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Unknown Keyhe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Peyton v. Vannoy et al
as 5:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Peyton
Defendant:
Warden Darrel Vannoy, Kandi Vannorman, K. Sewell and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Keyhe
as 3:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Unknown Keyhe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alford v. Crystal Springs City Police Dept. et al
as 4:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
DCorius K. Alford
Defendant:
Crystal Springs City Police Dept., Bob, Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Loden
as 4:2022cv00040
Petitioner:
Russell K. Hill
Respondent:
Warden C. Loden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
