Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Kemp v. Maryland Division of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv01888
Plaintiff:
Michael Kemp
Defendant:
Maryland Division of Corrections, Carlos Bivens, Todd Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooli v. Combs et al
as 8:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Basavaraj Hooli
Defendant:
Todd Combs, Andrea Lack1, Stacy Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Sears et al
as 1:2021cv01886
Defendant:
Erica Sears, Donna Kemp and Nicole Sears
Plaintiff:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Kemp v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01269
Plaintiff:
Christina Kemp
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Snyder v. Rowe et al
as 1:2020cv00952
Defendant:
DFC Kemp, Major Craig Rowe, DFC Greathead and others
Plaintiff:
Toby Wayne Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kemp et al v. Chatham Five Star LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02991
Plaintiff:
Charles Kemp and Linda Kemp
Defendant:
RDC Inn At Perry Cabin LLC and Chatham Five Star LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kemp v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00372
Plaintiff:
Jesse Eugene Kemp
Defendant:
Chad Cross, Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas, Beaumont Bone & Joint Institute,P.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kemp v. Seterus, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv00472
Plaintiff:
Donna Kemp
Defendant:
Seterus, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
