Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Leavitt v. Agilis Engineering, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Allison E Leavitt
Defendant:
Agilis Engineering, Inc., Belcan Engineering Group, LLC, Cyient, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Borozny et al. v. RTX Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Division, et al
as 3:2021cv01657
Plaintiff:
David Granata, James Rowe, Stephen Dowe and others
Defendant:
Pratt & Whitney, a Division of Raytheon Technologies Corporation, QuEST Global Services-NA, Inc., Belcan Engineering Group, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Tom Conroy, Christopher Novoa, Scott Prentiss and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Belcan LLC, Co-Conspirator, Does 1-50 and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Staffing Association
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
State of Connecticut et al v. USA et al
as 3:2009cv00054
Plaintiff:
State of Connecticut, State of Connecticut, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
USA, Health & Human Svc and Michael O. Leavitt
Movant:
State of New York, State of New York and Richard F. Daines
Intervenor Defendant:
Christian Medical Association, Christian Medical Association, Christian Medical Association and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Leavitt v. Middlefield
as 3:2008cv01894
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Leavitt
Defendant:
Town of Middlefield, Paul Pizzo, David Lowry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hifi DNA Tech LLC v. United States Dept of Health & Human Svcs et al
as 3:2008cv00054
Plaintiff:
Hifi DNA Tech LLC
Defendant:
United States Dept of Health & Human Svcs, United States Food & Drug Admin, Michael O. Leavitt and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hifi DNA Tech LLC v. Health & Human Svc et al
as 3:2007cv01511
Plaintiff:
Hifi DNA Tech LLC
Defendant:
Health & Human Svc, Food & Drug Admin, Michael O. Leavitt and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
