Cases 1 - 10 of 4,952
BEAUCHAMP v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
KELLEY M BEAUCHAMP
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Phillips v. Staton et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
Brock M. Staton, M Lester and M Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Meyer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
Caroline M. Meyer
Defendant:
Com'r of Soc. S Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
THOMAS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00685
Plaintiff:
TONYA M THOMAS
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gaspard et al v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Bradley J. Gaspard and Tammy M. Gaspard
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Snyder v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
George M. Snyder
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Callahan v. Dart et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
William M Callahan, II
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Christenson Copeland et al
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Smith and Jerry Antwon Smith
Defendant:
J Christenson Copeland, M Wala, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Galipeau et al
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jerry Smith and Jerry A Smith
Defendant:
Kenneth J Falk, John Galipeau, Kenneth Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
