Cases 31 - 40 of 11,450
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Avdeef, et al., v. Cole, et al.
as 3:2024cv01029
Petitioner:
Stephen M Avdeef and Melissa A Avdeef
Respondent:
Lindsey Nicole Cole, The State of Texas, Department Family Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Karki et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Anita Karki and Newton Prajapati
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick B Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Consensys Software Inc. v. Gensler et al
as 4:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Consensys Software Inc.
Defendant:
Gary Gensler, Caroline A. Crenshaw, Jaime E. Lizarraga and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Tartt v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01521
Plaintiff:
Jenell M. Tartt
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
