Cases 1 - 10 of 52
2814 N. Halsted LLC et al v. Service One Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
2814 N. Halsted LLC and Sami Allam
Defendant:
Service One Inc. doing business as BSI Financial Services and Mason McDuffie Mortgage Corp.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 - RESPA: Servicing of Mortgage Loans
Marker v. New Mexico House of Representatives et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Larry Marker
Respondent:
New Mexico House of Representatives, Eliseo Alcon, Anthony Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Webster v. Saia Ltl Freight
as 2:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
Mason Webster
Defendant:
Saia Ltl Freight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brown v. Mason Douglas LLC et al
as 2:2023mc00133
Plaintiff:
Patricia Brown
Defendant:
Mason Douglas LLC, Larry Harris Felt, Gregory Alan Attaway and others
Zaczkiewicz v. Maxar Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Michael Zaczkiewicz
Defendant:
Maxar Technologies, Inc., Daniel J. Jablonsky, Howell M. Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Johnson v. Maxar Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Johnson
Defendant:
Maxar Technologies, Inc., Daniel L. Jablonsky, Howell M. Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
United States v. Mason
as 23-3007
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ARMANI R. MASON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Mason
as 22-5083
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY LAMONT MASON, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
