Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HILLS v. MASON et al
as 1:2023cv03157
Plaintiff:
ROLAND HILLS
Defendant:
CHERYL L. MASON, KENNETH A. ARNOLD, JAIME AREIZAGA-SOTO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ESTATE OF ISMAEL GALVAN SOLORIO et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023cv02660
Plaintiff:
ismael galvan solorio, IRIS ZENIA SOLORIO, P Z and others
Not Classified By Court:
JR BALTAZAR MORIN
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
MASON v. AMERICAN PROSPECT, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02238
Plaintiff:
CHATAQUOA NICOLE MASON
Defendant:
AMERICAN PROSPECT, INC. and JULIANNE MCSHANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
JOHNSON v. COOKSON et al
as 1:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
DARRIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
ALVIN COOKSON, DANNY MASON, ALICE COOKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JENKINS v. MASON HARRIMAN GROUP, INC.
as 1:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
Duane Jenkins
Defendant:
Mason Harriman Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
MASON v. FNU KENT
as 1:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
OLIVER MASON
Defendant:
FNU KENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
