Cases 1 - 10 of 106
May v. McDermott
as 2:2024cv00450
Petitioner:
Edith Mae May
Respondent:
Jennifer McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
May v. McDermott et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, Mr Weber, Ms Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Rider et al
as 2:2023cv01691
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Pauline M Rider, Kenosha County Jail Classifications Department, Kenosha County Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv01564
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Officer Jackson, Officer Garvela, John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffer v. Kosicek et al
as 2:2023cv01516
Plaintiff:
Steven M Huffer
Defendant:
Carmen Kosicek, May Huffer, Kathy J Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Mays, Gary v. Cromwell, Dan
as 3:2023cv00780
Petitioner:
Gary C. Mays, Jr.
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
May v. Kiefer et al
as 2:2023cv01404
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Doctor, Doctors, Naph Care Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Naph Care Medical Services et al
as 2:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Defendant:
Naph Care Medical Services, Naph Care Medical Services Insurance Co, Kathleen Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Stevens
as 2:2023cv01119
Petitioner:
Antonio Darnell Mays
Respondent:
Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huffer v. Kosicek et al
as 2:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
Steven M Huffer
Defendant:
Carmen Kosicek, May Huffer, Kathy J Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
