Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Allen et al v. United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02056
Plaintiff:
Latasha Allen , Leola Atkins , Albert Bailey and others
Defendant:
United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC , Mueller Water Products Inc , USP Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morrell et al v. Thomas
as 1:2012cv00634
Plaintiff:
Judy Morrell and Bertha Zamora
Defendant:
Thomas David Lunceford, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Morrell v. Heinrich et al
as 7:2012cv02954
Plaintiff:
Jesse Morrell
Defendant:
Mark A Heinrich, Tommy Taylor and Thomas Huebner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. J.L. Clark Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00489
Plaintiff:
Morrel Cook
Defendant:
J.L. Clark Trucking, Inc. and James L. Clark
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Crutcher et al v. Limestone County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2010cv01175
Plaintiff:
Courtney Orlando Crutcher and Autumn Gray
Defendant:
Limestone County Sheriff's Department, Mike Blakely, Lance Royals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrell et al v. Lunceford et al
as 1:2009cv00753
Plaintiff:
Judy Morrell and Bertha Zamora
Defendant:
Thomas David Lunceford and Judith S. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Morrell v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv00483
Plaintiff:
Lisa M. Morrell
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
First South Hospitality, Inc. et al v. Kelly Lunceford Properties, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
First South Hospitality, Inc., Bertha Zamora and Judy Morrell
Defendant:
Kelly Lunceford Properties, LLC, Tommy Lunceford and Judith S. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
