Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Thai v. Morton
as 2:2012cv00190
Petitioner:
Anh Thai
Respondent:
John Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Teixeira v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv02560
Petitioner:
Joao Aparecido Teixeira
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Jr., Felicia S. Skinner, John Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gomaa v. Holder et al
as 2:2012cv00097
Petitioner:
Ahmed Gomaa
Respondent:
Eric Holder, John Morton, Stacy N. Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sanhaji v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv00671
Petitioner:
Yassine Sanhaji
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, John Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARRILLO-GUDIEL v. Skinner et al
as 4:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
CARLOS EDUARDO CARRILLO-GUDIEL
Defendant:
FELICIA SKINNER, JOHN T MORTON and MICHAEL SWINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson-Riviere v. U. S. Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2009cv02022
Petitioner:
Ray Alexander Thompson-Riviere
Respondent:
U. S. Department of Homeland Security, Pamela G. Hutchings, Felicia S. Skiller and others
Receiver:
Janet Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Jackson v. Morton
as 1:2009cv00102
Petitioner:
Melvin James Jackson
Respondent:
Calvin Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Morton et al
as 5:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Timothy Deshawn Jones
Defendant:
Calvin Morton, Brian Owens, Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. World Organization for Human Rights, USA et al
as 1:2008cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
World Organization for Human Rights, USA, Morton Sklar and Wang Xiaoning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hambrick v. Donald et al
as 5:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
Gene Hambrick
Defendant:
James Donald, Calvin Morton, Bruce Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
