Cases 1 - 10 of 125
WHEELERWEAVER v. C.O. TARGGART et al
as 3:2023cv22617
Plaintiff:
KHALIL WHEELERWEAVER
Defendant:
C.O. TARGGART, C.O. MORTON, ANISSA JETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SZEMPLE v. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY et al
as 3:2019cv12746
Defendant:
WILLIE BONDS, REGISTER SCO SAUNDERS, BEVERLY HASTINGS and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. HOOPER et al
as 2:2016cv07723
Plaintiff:
DARYLE MORTON
Defendant:
DARRYL HOOPER, RJUN, LUCAS S. SUMMERVILLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. NO DEFENDANT LISTED
as 1:2016cv06212
Plaintiff:
ELSIE MORTON
Defendant:
NO DEFENDANT LISTED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2016cv05859
Plaintiff:
YOSEFF MORTON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY and C.C.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORTON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2015cv07888
Plaintiff:
TYRON MORTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RUBEN B. MORALES, M. ANGUD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUTCLIFFE v. SALAS et al
as 3:2014cv03266
Plaintiff:
JOHN SUTCLIFFE
Defendant:
ESTER SALAS, THE N.J. DISTRICT COURT NEWARK DIVISION, DAVID MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. MORTON et al
as 2:2014cv02218
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS M. THOMPSON
Defendant:
DAVID MORTON, KAYMAMI D. WEST, PETER E. DOYME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAI v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2014cv01827
Plaintiff:
DONG CAI
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT OF DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, J. CABRERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAI v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2014cv00068
Plaintiff:
DONG CAI
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE), J. CABRERA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
