Cases 1 - 10 of 250
Dowling v. United States Attorney's Office
as 5:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Angela D. Dowling and Angela Perez Dowling
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Padilla v. Osvaldo Perez et al
as 1:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Kailey Padilla
Defendant:
Daniel Osvaldo Perez, Williamson County and Williamson County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez Dowling v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Angela Dawn Perez Dowling
Defendant:
United States Of America and State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Krishna et al
as 1:2023cv01507
Plaintiff:
Willie Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Kris B. Krishna, Michael Swan, Tatiana Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watson v. Perez
as 5:2023cv01457
Plaintiff:
Robert James Watson
Defendant:
Officer M. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dowling v. Legacy at Cypress Apartments, Tri Arc
as 1:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
Angela D Dowling and Angela D Perez Dowling
Defendant:
Legacy at Cypress Apartments, Tri Arc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dowling v. Google et al
as 1:2023cv01264
Plaintiff:
Angela D Dowling and Angela D Perez Dowling
Defendant:
Google and Apple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez Dowling v. Geico.com et al
as 1:2023cv01256
Plaintiff:
Angela D Perez Dowling and Angela D Dowling
Defendant:
Geico.com, Amici.com, Amazon.com and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dowling v. Legacy at Cypress Apartments, Tri Arc
as 1:2023cv01255
Plaintiff:
Angela D Dowling and Angela D Perez Dowling
Defendant:
Legacy at Cypress Apartments, Tri Arc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
