Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Pineda Landaverde et al v. American Excavating, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E. Pineda Landaverde, Linton J. Mejia Alfaro and Arnold Alfaro Cruz
Defendant:
American Excavating, Inc. and Gary T. Wood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Gutierrez et al v. Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc.
as 7:2022cv00604
Plaintiff:
Augusto Gutierrez, Walter Artica, Gilberto Andrade and others
Defendant:
Baird Drywall & Acoustic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Barrera-Pineda v. Leu
as 2:2022cv00411
Petitioner:
Oscar Orlando Barrera-Pineda
Respondent:
D. Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ascencio v. Caroline Detention Facility et al
as 1:2021cv01432
Petitioner:
Jose Alberto Pineda Ascencio
Respondent:
Caroline Detention Facility and Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Berrios et al v. The Circle Group, LLC
as 1:2020cv00230
Defendant:
The Circle Group LLC and The Circle Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
Miguel Martinez, Cristian Cornejo, Fidel Berrios and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pineda-Mendez v. USA
as 3:2017cv00743
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alex Pineda-Mendez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pineda v. Coco Rico, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01107
Plaintiff:
Elmer Adaly Ponce Pineda
Defendant:
Coco Rico, Inc. and Joseph Asmar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pineda-Mendez v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv00602
Petitioner:
Alex Pineda-Mendez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
