Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Quinonez Venegas v. Warden, FCI Forrest City
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner: Sergio Ivan Quinonez Venegas
Respondent: Warden, FCI Forrest City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Quinonez v. Perez et al
as 3:2023cv00291
Plaintiff: Judith Quinonez
Defendant: Isaias Perez and Tournesol Siteworks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Discrimination
Type: Labor Labor: Other
FILING ERROR
as 3:2023cv00290
Plaintiff: Judith Quinonez
Defendant: Tournesol Siteworks, LLC and Isiah Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Type: Labor Labor: Other
FILING ERROR
as 3:2023cv00289
Plaintiff: Judith Quinonez
Defendant: Gordon & Rees Attn: Cindy M. and Isiah Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Quinonez v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv01588
Petitioner: Leonardo Mendoza Quinonez
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinonez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00186
Petitioner: Leonardo Mendoza Quinonez
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinonez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2022cv00085
Petitioner: James Quinonez
Respondent: Hughes Unit and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Texan Wire Wheels, LLC v. Marshall et al
as 4:2022cv00505
Plaintiff: Texan Wire Wheels, LLC
Defendant: Earl Marshall, Mike Nagatani, Theresa Quinonez-Nagatani and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Quinonez v. Saul
as 4:2021cv02439
Plaintiff: Michelle Quinonez
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv02386
Plaintiff: Michelle Quinonez
Defendant: Social Security Adminstration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?