Cases 1 - 10 of 5,458
Ramirez v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Luis Ramirez
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Luis Ramirez v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
Luis Ramirez
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Ramirez v. Ameresco, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00949
Plaintiff:
Hugo Ramirez
Defendant:
Ameresco, Inc. and Bernard Nickels Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Godinez-Ramirez v. Garland
as 24-2788
Petitioner:
ANABEL GODINEZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Michael N. Brown v. Azusa Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv03569
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Brown
Defendant:
Azusa Police Department, Los Angeles County Fire Battalion 16, City of Hope - West Covina Hematology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maney, et al. v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-2715
Plaintiff:
PAUL MANEY, GARY CLIFT, THERON HALL and others
Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON, COLETTE PETERS, HEIDI STEWARD, ACTING DIRECTOR and others
Santamaria-Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2700
Petitioner:
MARTA ALICIA SANTAMARIA-RAMIREZ and ERICK ADOLFO LEIVA-SANTAMARIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez-Salas De Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2671
Petitioner:
DENIA MERCI RAMIREZ-SALAS DE MARTINEZ, YASMIN CAMILA MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ and LEANDRO OMAR RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2609
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE LOPEZ RAMIREZ, IAN EMMANUEL CERRITOS LOPEZ and CHRISTOPHER ALONSO CERRITOS LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez Rivera, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2587
Plaintiff:
ELIA RAMIREZ RIVERA and ROBERTO CASIANO CHINO
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
