Cases 31 - 40 of 137
The New Georgia Project et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2020cv01986
Defendant:
Tim McFalls, John Mangano, Brad Raffensperger and others
Plaintiff:
Reagan Jennings, The New Georgia Project, Candace Woodall and others
Amicus Curiae:
Public Interest Legal Foundation and Landmark Legal Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leggette v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2020cv01369
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Randolph Leggette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randolph v. USI Insurance Services, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv05467
Plaintiff:
Todd C. Randolph
Defendant:
USI Insurance Services, LLC and Anco Insurance Services of Houston, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amberlake Village LLC v. Randolph
as 1:2019cv05222
Plaintiff:
Amberlake Village LLC
Defendant:
Alycia Randolph
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
State of Georgia v. Richards
as 4:2019cv00262
Plaintiff:
State of Georgia
Defendant:
Eric Randolph Richards
Barrett v. J. Grady Randolph Inc.
as 1:2019cv04903
Plaintiff:
Ihson N. Barrett and Ihsan N. Barrett
Defendant:
J. Grady Randolph Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Riverdale Clayton LLC et al v. Randolph
as 1:2019mi00160
Plaintiff:
Riverdale Clayton LLC, CSS Services, Inc. and Harmony Pines
Defendant:
Tammy Randolph
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04868
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Riverdale Clayton LLC et al v. Randolph
as 1:2019cv04571
Plaintiff:
Riverdale Clayton LLC, CSS Services, Inc. and Harmony Pines
Defendant:
Tammy Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. H & H Hospitality, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv04064
Defendant:
Mindy Hall, Kevin J. Holt, Mindy Fortson and others
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
