Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Robinson v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
Wilmar Robinson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Beth Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Robinson v. Social Security Disability
as 7:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Shanique Robinson
Defendant:
Social Security Disability
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Melvin Richard Robinson, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Robinson v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
John Robinson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Robinson v. Saul
as 7:2021cv00042
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
James Joel Robinson and James Joel Robinson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00358
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Melvin Richard Robinson, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205
SHEPHERD v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00966
Plaintiff:
ROBIN ROBINSON SHEPHERD
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
