Cases 21 - 30 of 98
Dunham v. Saratoga Springs City et al
as 2:2019cv00641
Defendant:
Derek Dalton, Zachary Robinson and Saratoga Springs City
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dunham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shields v. Robinson et al
as 4:2019cv00072
Plaintiff:
Adam D. Shields
Defendant:
Sean Casey, Blake Hunsaker, Jeremy Etherington and others
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pirela v. Robinson
as 2:2018cv00323
Petitioner:
Edwin Mitchell Pirela
Defendant:
Michael Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Sampson
as 2:2018cv00188
Plaintiff:
Cindy Robinson
Defendant:
Cody Sampson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blair et al v. Robinson et al
as 2:2018cv00150
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Blair , Alistair Blair and Jamieson Blair
Defendant:
John M. Robinson, Ricardo T. Rios and Browns Amusements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Windham v. Allen et al
as 2:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
Maria E. Windham
Defendant:
Nathaniel Robert Allen, Heather Allen, Nate Allen Financial Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
McNalley v. Smith et al
as 2:2017cv01021
Plaintiff:
Patricia McNalley
Defendant:
Jeffrey Allan Smith, Blake D. Fenn, Tanner Grow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stein v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2017cv00986
Plaintiff:
Richard Norman Stein
Defendant:
State of Utah, McKay Dee Hospital, FNU Summers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ritterbush v. Turley et al
as 2:2017cv00845
Defendant:
Kevin Tucker, Joe Hughes, Michael Robinson and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Plaintiff:
Lyndal D Ritterbush and Lyndal D. Ritterbush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
