Cases 11 - 20 of 216
USA v. Ross Landfried
as 23-2816
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROSS LANDFRIED
In re: Tibbs v. Electrocore, Inc, et al
as 23-2655
Petitioner / Appellant:
In re: CAROLE TIBBS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELECTROCORE INC, FRANCIS R. AMATO, GLENN S. VRANIAK and others
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP et al v. THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2023cv18091
Plaintiff:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP (DBA VERIZON WIRELESS), NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS, CELLCO PARTNERSHIP doing business as VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, DIRECTOR THOMAS A. ARNONE and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Belmar Against 5G Towers, Lawrence Reynolds, Rose Daganya and others
Counter Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP and NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
Lang v. Surface Oncology, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Robert Lang
Defendant:
Surface Oncology, Inc., Denice Torres, Carsten Brunn and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
USA v. Raphael Ross
as 23-1631
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RAPHAEL ROSS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
