Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Jones, Dynzel v. Sanders, Daniel et al
as 3:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Dynzel Jones
Defendant:
Daniel Sanders, Paula Kuecker, Feltz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gardner v. Sanders
as 2:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Pierre Douglas Gardner
Defendant:
Mark A Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Donnell Devonte Sanders
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Hepp et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Quordalis V Sanders
Defendant:
Randall Hepp, Yana Posich, Tonnie Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Stadtmueller
as 2:2023cv01730
Plaintiff:
Quordalis V Sanders
Defendant:
Judge J P Stadtmueller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Sanders v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections Division of Community Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01664
Plaintiff:
Quordalis V Sanders
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections Division of Community Corrections, Briann Geriler and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Hepp
as 2:2023cv01665
Petitioner:
Quordalis V Sanders
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sanders v. Griesbach et al
as 2:2023cv01627
Plaintiff:
Quordalis V Sanders
Defendant:
Judge William Griesbach, Victoria Van-Burns, PA Krool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 1:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Quordalis V Sanders
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Asst Dist Attys, Racine County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
