Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Galvan v. Todo Auto Repair, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Galvan
Defendant:
Todo Auto Repair, Inc. and Jacobo Sarabia
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Vargas v. Brambila et al
as 1:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Mr Jesus Vargas
Defendant:
Emanuel Brambila, Village of Stone Park, The, Ricardo Sarabia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
York v. Sarabia et al
as 1:2021cv03978
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. York, Jr.
Defendant:
North Chicago Police Detective Jose Sarabia, North Chicago Police Detective Michael Mueller, Lake County Assistant State's Attorney Kennet LaRue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Manuel Gonzalez-Sarabia
as 20-3505
Defendant / Appellant:
MANUEL GONZALEZ-SARABIA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Vargas v. Village of Stone Park et al
as 1:2019cv03079
Defendant:
Village of Stone Park, Officer Numanaj, Officer Sarabia and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Robertson v. Det. G. Sarabia et al
as 1:2018cv04019
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Robertson
Movant:
Gregory E. Kulis & Associates, Ltd.
Defendant:
Det. G. Sarabia and Village of Winnetka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Mase et al
as 1:2013cv04952
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Bell
Defendant:
B. Mase, Lt. Bragassi, M. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02194
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Jimmerson v. Sarabia et al
as 1:2013cv01750
Plaintiff:
Jocelyn Jimmerson
Defendant:
Det. Jose Sarabia, City Of North Chicago and Inv. Ramtin Sabet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
