Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Emhart Industries, et al v. CNA Holdings LLC, et al
as 19-1563
3Rd Party Defendant:
ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, UNILEVER, BNS LLC and others
Defendant:
NEW ENGLAND CONTAINER COMPANY INC, ROBERT M. GATES, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC. and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, by and through the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Defendant / Appellee:
US NAVY, US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES and others
Interested Party:
DOW INC., f/k/a Dow Chemical Company, RHODES TECHNOLOGIES INC and WIN NOREN
Gustavsen, et al v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 17-2066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GUSTAVSEN, JOSEPH CUGINI, DEMETRA COHEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., ALCON RESEARCH LTD., FALCON PHARMACEUTICALS LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN TORT REFORM ASSOCIATION, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS and others
Sharp, et al v. Hylas Yachts, LLC, et al
as 16-1923
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NELSON R. SHARP and DESTINY YACHTS, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
HYLAS YACHTS, LLC
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
GMT COMPOSITES, INC. and FORESPAR PRODUCTS CORP.
Third Party Defendant:
MASTERVOLT, INC.
Sharp, et al v. Hylas Yachts, LLC, et al
as 16-1917
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NELSON R. SHARP and DESTINY YACHTS, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
HYLAS YACHTS, LLC
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
GMT COMPOSITES, INC. and FORESPAR PRODUCTS CORP.
Third Party Defendant:
MASTERVOLT, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
