Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Lavi v. Sharp
as 1:2023cv03617
Plaintiff:
P. Lavi
Defendant:
Mr. Bradley Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sharpe v. McFarland
as 1:2022cv09834
Petitioner:
Elliett Sharpe
Respondent:
Warden Boncher and Patrick Mcfarland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rickenbacker v. John Doe No. 1 et al
as 9:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rickenbacker
Defendant:
John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2, John Doe No. 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. N.V. Organon et al
as 9:2021cv00853
Plaintiff:
Kamron Campbell
Defendant:
N.V. Organon, Merck Sharp and Dohme LTD, Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rickenbacker v. John Doe No. 1 et al
as 1:2021cv00672
Defendant:
Attorney General Leticia James, John Doe No. 3, John Doe No. 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rickenbacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Plirer et al
as 1:2021cv03163
Petitioner:
Hosea Jackson
Respondent:
A.U.S.A Robert Sharpe, Warden W.S. Plirer and Tom Marcelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Lewis v. Hanson et al
as 9:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis
Defendant:
Jason Hanson, Joseph Sharpe, Scott Mere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Dr. John Doe et al
as 1:2017cv04222
Plaintiff:
Rafael Perez
Defendant:
Dr. John Doe, Dr. Makram, Ms. Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2017cv00003
Plaintiff:
Albert Morgan
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Karen Bellamy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Hanson et al
as 9:2016cv00804
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lewis
Defendant:
J. Hanson, J. Sharpe, S. Mere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
