Cases 21 - 30 of 234
Sharpe v. Koch et al
as 1:2021cv01318
Plaintiff:
Danielle Sharpe
Defendant:
Melissa A. Koch and Wayne County Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Sharp v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02256
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharp v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00965
Plaintiff:
Lee Sharp
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharp v. USPS HR Shared Services Center
as 4:2021cv00520
Defendant:
USPS HR Shared Services Center and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodgers v. APEX Roofing, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00064
Defendant:
FC Roofing, LLC, Diane Gabbard, Hugo Figueroa and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Rodgers
3Rd Party Defendant:
Felix Gervacio and Gervacio Remodelation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Sharp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Sharp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sharpe v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv02732
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Alexa Rhey Sharpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aucker v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 1:2020cv00853
Defendant:
Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and others
Plaintiff:
John Aucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zuercher v. AstraZeneca LP et al
as 1:2020cv00869
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia R Zuercher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
