Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Feaster v. Sammons et al
as 1:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Feaster
Defendant:
Walter Sammons, Officer Norman, Officer Carver R and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feaster v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00313
Plaintiff:
Terrance J Feaster
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Ronald T. Erdos, Cynthia Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pullen v. Mohr et al
as 1:2018cv00386
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Pullen
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Ron Erdos, Crabtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fluellen v. USA
as 1:2016cv01475
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Sherman C. Fluellen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Martin v. Sinclair Community College et al
as 4:2016cv01074
Plaintiff:
William E. Martin
Defendant:
Sinclair Community College, ACI Regional School Principal, Steven Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rafferty, et al v. Trumbull County, Ohio et al
as 4:2016cv00430
Plaintiff:
Michele L. Rafferty and Katie L. Sherman
Defendant:
Trumbull County, Ohio, Frank S. Fuda, Trumbull County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosby v. Hanson
as 4:2015cv01558
Petitioner:
DeAndra Sherman Mosby
Respondent:
Ralph Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mohley v. Sherman et al
as 3:2015cv00559
Plaintiff:
David Mohley
Defendant:
Warden Sherman, Nurse Kizer, Doctor Estez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2014cv00453
Plaintiff:
Otis Lee Rodgers
Defendant:
State Of Ohio, Ohio Parole Board, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Mahoning County Jail et al
as 4:2013cv01469
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Thomas
Defendant:
Mahoning County Jail, Randall A. Wellington, Steve Szekley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
