Cases 1 - 10 of 563
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Salgado Garcia v. Max Granite LLC et al
as 0:2024cv61051
Plaintiff:
Edith Salgado Garcia
Defendant:
Max Granite LLC doing business as Kitchen Konnections, Kitchen Konnections LLC, Maxiley P. Da Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gomez v. Blessed Cars LLC et al
as 6:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
Lina M. Gomez
Defendant:
Blessed Cars LLC and Edwin H. Silva
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BINDSLEV v. SILVA
as 1:2024cv21088
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN BINDSLEV
Defendant:
MELISSA CAROLINA SILVA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Da Silva v. Fox Rent a Car, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00889
Plaintiff:
LIVIA DA SILVA
Defendant:
FOX RENT A CAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Yearicks IV v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2024cv20854
Plaintiff:
Earl Frank Yearicks IV
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, J.T. Barret, N. Silva Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
SILVA v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD.
as 1:2024cv20866
Plaintiff:
PRISCILA SILVA
Defendant:
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD. doing business as ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Murillo et al v. Maximus Pro Solutions Corp et al
as 3:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Alden Murillo and Daniel Murillo
Defendant:
Maximus Pro Solutions Corp doing business as Maximus Pools and William Da Silva
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
