Cases 1 - 10 of 387
Evans v. Sgt. Upole et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glenn Evans
Defendant:
Sgt. Upole, Ofc. Kock, Sgt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
United States, Officer Bryant, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mellotte v. Reyes et al
as 1:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Randall Mellotte
Defendant:
Ofc. M. Reyes, Ofc. R. Smith, Lt. G. Forney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. St. Clair et al
as 1:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Ja-mo Kimu Smith
Defendant:
Scott Alan St. Clair, Scott Huff and Hagerstown Poice Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00760
Plaintiff:
Tavon Smith
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services, et al
as 1:2024cv00715
Defendant:
Yes Care Client Services, Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services, Corizon Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Ernest Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Maryland State Police et al
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Rodney Andrew McNeil
Defendant:
Maryland State Police, Det. Becker, S/Tpr Whorton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Bivens et al
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Jachin Boaz Walls, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Carlos Bivens, Dr. Kyle Smith, Andrea Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Coulbourn
as 1:2023cv03390
Petitioner:
Lamont M. Smith
Respondent:
T. Coulbourn and Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Smith
as 1:2023cv02963
Plaintiff:
Dustin W. Perry
Defendant:
India Smith, RN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
