Cases 41 - 50 of 1,096
Bermudez-Solis, et al. v. Garland
as 23-1818
Petitioner:
WILBER ANTONIO BERMUDEZ-SOLIS, MIRIAM SUHEY ZAMORA-FONSECA and JEFFERSON JOSE BERMUDEZ-ZAMORA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Lopez-Solis v. Garland
as 22-932
Petitioner:
ROLANDO LOPEZ-SOLIS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Macias-Solis v. Garland
as 21-368
Petitioner:
RICARDO MACIAS-SOLIS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fl Removal- Fair Labor Standards Act
Estate of Mario Solis et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2023cv00989
Plaintiff:
Estate of Mario Solis and Sara Solis
Defendant:
County of Riverside, a public entity, Riverside County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Chad Bianco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jannet Solis et al v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04024
Plaintiff:
Jannet Solis, Michael Ortega, Advanced Weight Loss Surgical Association and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc., Does 1-10 and UnitedHealthCare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Diana Solis v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv05511
Plaintiff:
Diana Solis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
H. Orozco v. Kathryn Barger et al
as 2:2023cv04047
Plaintiff:
H. OROZCO
Defendant:
KATHRYN BARGER, JANICE HAHN, SHIELA KEUHL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Solis Ramirez v. Garland
as 22-678
Petitioner:
CARMEN ELENA SOLIS RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
