Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Custis v. Exmore Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
William Parke Custis
Defendant:
Exmore Police Department, Adam Zieger, Jonathan Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Towns v. Nunley, et al
as 7:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Jamie Towns
Respondent:
Unknown, Cory Nunley and Colette S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lester v. Nemo et al
as 7:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cody Lester
Defendant:
Penny Nemo, Jim Shortt, Katy Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson-Townes v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2022cv01356
Petitioner:
Shalon Demon Johnson-Townes
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Royal v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Jarice L. Royal
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Red Onion State Prison, River North Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Wallens Ridge State Prison et al
as 7:2022cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah D. Scott
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Red Onion State Prison, River North Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Marion Town Police Depart.
as 7:2020cv00606
Defendant:
Marion Town Police Depart.
Plaintiff:
Billy Junior Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
