Cases 1 - 10 of 212
Williamson v. Garfield County Detention Facility et al
as 5:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Justice Walter Williamson
Defendant:
Garfield County Detention Facility, Amanda Lilly and Enid County Police Station
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant:
Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00286
Petitioner:
Walter D Hunter
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Bridges
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Walter D. Hunter
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walters v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Winston Ray Walters
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bromlow et al v. D & M Carriers, LLC
as 5:2020cv00195
Plaintiff:
Matthew Bromlow, Johnny Walters and Benny Stewart
Defendant:
D & M Carriers, LLC, D & M Carriers, LLC doing business as Freymiller and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Boismier v. Walters
as 5:2023cv00767
Plaintiff:
Summer Boismier
Defendant:
Ryan Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Walters v. Goldey
as 5:2023cv00796
Petitioner:
Mark Walters
Respondent:
Kris Goldey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
