Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 11 - 20 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04998
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00733
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chan v. Exley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv09990
Plaintiff: Kathy Hai-Ying Chan
Defendant: Zack Evan Exley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv08027
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv07007
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv04992
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv04913
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Thomas et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,et al
as 3:2020cv07276
Plaintiff: ALLISON D. SALAZAR, LINDA J. THOMAS, CLYDE STEPHENS and others
Defendant: SAFEWAY, INC, PFIZER INC., INCORRECTLY DESIGNATED AS DOE 4, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, INCORRECTLY DESIGNATED AS DOE 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv07029
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Guan v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 4:2020cv05719
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Plaintiff: Ying Ying Guan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?