Cases 41 - 50 of 259
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ying Niu v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2022cv07108
Plaintiff:
Ying Niu
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, Rosemary Langley Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Chang et al
as 2:2022at00807
Plaintiff:
Ger Chong Ze Chang, Mai Nou Vang, Russell Mathis and others
Defendant:
County of Siskiyou and Jeremiah LaRue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chang et al v. County of Siskiyou et al
as 2:2022cv01378
Plaintiff:
Ger Chong Ze Chang, Mai Nou Vang, Russell Mathis and others
Defendant:
County of Siskiyou and Jeremiah LaRue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
