Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Emile et al v. Ethical Culture Fieldston School et al
as 1:2021cv03799
Defendant:
"John and Jane Does", Jessica L. Bagby, Nigel Furlonge and others
Plaintiff:
A.C.E., Kim Emile and Arielle Emile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Frost v. NYC A.C.S. et al
as 1:2019cv09330
Defendant:
NYC MTA, NYC A.C.S., Bronx Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv05494
Plaintiff:
Bernard Bey and J&J
Defendant:
City of New York, Bailey House Inc., A.C.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv03919
Defendant:
A.C.S., Bailey House Inc., City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Bey and J.J.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murray v. New York State Division of Parole et al
as 1:2013cv07090
Defendant:
Detective Paul Bostic, Alphonso Camacho, A.C.S. Agent Lastarr Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter K. Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Canning v. Administration For Children's
as 13-4047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Adanna Canning and Joseph Canning
Defendant - Appellee:
Administration For Children's Services, Queens, Janet Ceasar, A.C.S Case Worker, Ronald Richter, Commissioner A.C.S. of Queens and others
Ampratwum v. City of New York
as 13-2165
Plaintiff:
Fatima Fisher, Two years old and Raheem Fisher, Ten years old
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tashena Ampratwum and Eric Fisher
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, NYPD Agency, CCRB Agency's Graham Daw-Esq. and others
White v. A.C.S.
as 1:2012cv08807
Plaintiff:
Jamel White
Defendant:
A.C.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Best v. A.C.S. et al
as 1:2012cv07874
Plaintiff:
Bishop Frank Best
Defendant:
A.C.S., Lutheran Social Services and Episcopal Social Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Cigarette Labeling & Advertising Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
